page contents

How fossil fuel execs lobbied black leaders to overturn a California citys coal ban

Please follow and like us:

Their primary goal was to construct a marine terminal to carry coal through the city, raising worries of increased air contamination

L ast spring, an uncommon conference occurred in Oakland, California , in between the NFL star Marshawn Lynch and nonrenewable fuel source business executives who are looking for to develop a marine terminal that would deliver countless lots of coal through the city each year. According to among the financiers who established the conference, its function was to go over utilizing task earnings to money regional charities.

Nothing came of it, however over the previous year the coal terminal’s backers have actually established lots of comparable events with city authorities, pastors, labor leaders, and other prominent residents as part of a more comprehensive lobbying project to get rid of opposition to coal, according to files just recently acquired by the Guardian.

Their primary goal, according to internal business records revealed as part of a current personal bankruptcy, is to persuade Oakland’s leaders to drop a legal appeal versus the job.

If the marine terminal is constructed, ecologists fear that dust and diesel emissions from trains– as numerous as 3 100-car trains showing up every day with coal from mines in Utah and other states– will contaminate San Francisco Bay location communities where kids currently struggle with raised rates of asthma.

San San Francisco Bay location ecologists fear dust and diesel emissions from trains will contaminate areas where kids currently experience high rates of asthma. Photo: Tim Hussin/The Guardian

Citing these issues, in 2016 the Oakland city board voted to prohibit the storage and handling of coal within city limitations, successfully canceling the task unless its designer vowed to leave out nonrenewable fuel source products. The Oakland Bulk and Oversized Terminal, an Oakland-based business which is leading building of the marine terminal, has actually decreased to make any such promise.

Instead, OBOT took legal action against the city and in May 2018 a federal judge agreed the business by revoking the coal restriction. The city appealed the judge’s judgment and court hearings are set up for November.

Oakland’s legal opposition to coal has actually been pricey for both sides.

Insight Terminal Solutions, a Kentucky-based business led by veteran coal market executive John Siegel, shared of OBOT’s legal expenses to reverse the city’s coal restriction. ITS wishes to rent the terminal from OBOT once it’s constructed, nevertheless, Siegel’s business declared insolvency defense in July.

Siegel and OBOT’s CEO, Phil Tagami, both blamed the city for stopping working to turn over files that Insight Terminal Solutions required to get funding.

A side-effect of the insolvency is the general public release of internal business records, consisting of the coal business’s lobbying activities in Oakland.

The records reveal that at the exact same time the coal terminal financiers have actually been fighting the city in court, they have actually likewise invested 10s of thousands on regional lobbyists wishing to persuade Oakland’s city board to drop its legal opposition.

According to his travel schedule, Siegel has actually made 15 different journeys to Oakland over the previous year to satisfy independently with city authorities. The court filings expose that in September his business paid $25,000 to sponsor a gala celebration at an Oakland museum which was gone to by political leaders and effective regional magnate. Insight Terminal Solutions likewise paid an Oakland blog writer $5,000 a month to promote the coal terminal on social networks.

Finding allies in Oakland’s black neighborhood, which has actually experienced out of proportion direct exposure to contamination from the city’s port for years, has actually been a crucial objective of the coal lobbyists.

In a 29 January letter Siegel sent his company partners, he described his choice to employ “a prominent African American lobbyist and business owner”, called Greg McConnell to represent him in Oakland. Siegel composed that “no matter how engaging I might be, I am still a white outsider and [McConnell] is most extremely an expert”.

Siegel paid a $15,000 charge to McConnell, plus a $7,500 month-to-month retainer to establish conferences with “target neighborhood activists who, as soon as won over to our side, might assist us tremendously with numerous of the city board members”.

One city authorities who satisfied consistently with Siegel and McConnell over the previous year was the Oakland city board president, Rebecca Kaplan.

Siegel informed the Guardian that his discussions with Kaplan and other city authorities were restricted to security functions and neighborhood advantages, which they did not talk about the claim in between the city and OBOT.

Oakland's
Oakland’s black neighborhood has actually suffered disproportionately from contamination from the city’s port for years. Picture: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Kaplan stated, nevertheless, that she has actually talked about settling the suit with Siegel.

“I have actually consulted with them, to discuss their strategies in Oakland, consisting of the capacity for what it may require to settle the lawsuits,” Kaplan composed in an e-mail to the Guardian. “In my conversations with them, I advised them to check out choices for products aside from coal/petcoke for their proposed bulk shipping terminal.”

A file supplied by Insight Terminal Solutions to Kaplan in July, prior to she consulted with the business’s lobbyist Greg McConnell in a personal space at a seafood dining establishment in Oakland’s Jack London Square, mentions that “without coal, the terminal can not be constructed”, however the business assured just “tidy coal” will be dealt with. The exact same file declares that the city will see $6m in profits each year from a wharfage charge plus $5m in contributions to an Oakland Initiatives Fund, which can support charities and health programs.

However, the file specifies that none of this will be possible without the coal and the city terminal’s backers very first settling the claim over the coal restriction.

Several files produced in the personal bankruptcy case reveal that Siegel and his partners have actually just recently remained in talks with the Japanese energy business JERA in hopes it will accept buy countless lots of coal each year delivered through the Oakland terminal. Another possible customer who may purchase the terminal is Oxbow Carbon, an energy business owned by William Koch. And the state of Utah is likewise still promising a financial investment of $50m in state funds in the Oakland task to discover an export market for coal mined in numerous counties.

Tagami and Siegel state their strategies consist of mitigation steps such as covered train vehicles and domed storage facilities to practically remove coal dust contamination.

One of Siegel’s newest conferences occurred in early October with the west Oakland activist Margaret Gordon, who established the West Oakland Environmental Indicators Project in 2004 to promote for air contamination manages at the Port of Oakland. Amongst the city’s most prominent ecological activists, Gordon supported Oakland’s coal restriction in 2016.

According to a letter composed by Siegel and divulged in the personal bankruptcy case, Zachary Wasserman, an Oakland lawyer and political fundraising event for numerous council members, informed Siegel that “winning over” Margaret Gordon would be essential to rebooting the coal terminal task. He explained Gordon as “an African American lady who obviously has a substantial quantity of influence”.

Asked today whether she’s altered her mind about the coal strategy and will promote for a settlement of the claim in between the coal and the city terminal designer, Gordon informed the Guardian just, “No coal.”

Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/oct/23/how-fossil-fuel-execs-lobbied-black-leaders-to-overturn-a-california-citys-coal-ban

Please follow and like us:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

14 + 6 =

Back to top
X
%d bloggers like this: